Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-05-31 Origin: Site
In the meat processing industry, equipment procurement decisions directly affect production efficiency and food safety. According to industry research data, 72% of small and medium-sized enterprises suffer annual losses exceeding 150000 yuan due to equipment failures, including:
Refurbished machine impersonating a new machine: A frozen product processing factory purchased a "brand new" meat grinder, which was actually assembled with a second-hand motor. After using it for 3 months, the motor burned out, resulting in a direct loss of the order value of 80000 yuan.
Material is inferior for good: A sausage manufacturer's filling machine was recalled by the European Union and fined over 200000 euros due to excessive heavy metal migration caused by the use of non food grade alloys in its core components.
Risk of certification deficiency: A saw bone machine purchased by an e-commerce platform was seized at a German exhibition due to not passing CE certification, and was jointly fined over $50000 for storage.
Avoiding pitfalls: Beware of "high-power" false advertising. A factory registered a 3kW motor, but the measured power was only 1.8kW, resulting in frequent machine jamming during frozen meat processing.
Acceptance criteria: It is required to provide a motor power measurement report, with priority given to industrial grade copper wire motors.
Avoidance point: 304 stainless steel ≠ whole machine 304. A certain low-priced model only has the outer shell labeled as 304, and the internal hinge is actually chrome plated carbon steel, which rusted and contaminated the food after 3 months.
Acceptance criteria: It is required to provide a material inspection report for the entire machine, with a focus on verifying the food grade stainless steel certification (such as EN 10088 standard) of components that come into contact with food such as the auger, blade group, and discharge port.
Avoidance point: Equipment without CE certification cannot clear customs in the EU market. A certain manufacturer forged a CE certificate, and the equipment was detained by customs and needs to be re certified, resulting in a delay of 45 days in delivery.
Acceptance criteria: Verify the authenticity of the CE certification number (which can be queried through the EU Nando system), with a focus on checking the electrical safety of EN 60204-1 and the safety level of EN 13849-1 control systems.
Avoiding pitfalls: The nominal cutting thickness of a certain model can be adjusted by 0.1mm, but the actual measurement error is ± 0.5mm, resulting in uneven steak thickness and a customer return rate soaring to 18%.
Acceptance criteria: on-site cutting testing is required, with a measured error of ≤ 0.2mm using a vernier caliper.
Avoidance point: A certain manufacturer did not label the saw blade material, but actually used ordinary spring steel, which has a fracture frequency of up to 3 times per day when cutting frozen meat.
Acceptance criteria: It is required to provide proof of saw blade material, and priority should be given to models with automatic tensioning systems.
Avoidance point: The nominal noise of a certain model is ≤ 65dB, but it has been measured to be 78dB. It is forced to install soundproof rooms, with an additional cost of over 20000 yuan.
Acceptance criteria: It is required to provide a third-party noise detection report (referring to GB 3096-2008 standard), and priority should be given to models with shock-absorbing bases.
Avoiding pitfalls: A certain model claims to be "fully automatic", but in reality, it requires manual assistance to put on the casing, resulting in an efficiency improvement of only 30%, far below the claimed 200%.
Acceptance criteria: It is required to demonstrate the complete automation process (from meat filling conveying → quantitative filling → twisting → finished product output), with a focus on the PLC control system brand.
Avoidance point: A certain model uses a welded hopper, and the residual minced meat breeds bacteria, leading to excessive levels of E. coli in the product.
Acceptance criteria: Verify compliance with EN 1672-2 hygiene design standards (such as surface roughness Ra ≤ 0.8 μ m, no dead corner structure), and prioritize the use of detachable hoppers.
Avoidance point: A certain factory's trademark claims to fill 300kg per hour, but the actual measurement shows only 180kg under standard technology, resulting in delayed order delivery.
Acceptance criteria: Third party capacity testing reports are required, and priority should be given to models with variable frequency speed regulation.
Supplier qualification screening
Suppliers with less than 3 years of establishment, no physical factories, and refusal to provide CE/ISO certification will be directly eliminated.
Prioritize selecting government supply chain warehousing enterprises.
Contract Risk Clause
Clearly define the compensation terms for refurbished machines (such as "one compensation for ten fake"), the warranty period for core components (recommended motor ≥ 3 years), and the fault response time (such as 24-hour on-site visit).
Investment return calculation
Taking the meat grinder as an example: the equipment cost is 50000 yuan. Calculated based on processing 2 tons of frozen meat per day, the annual labor cost savings are about 120000 yuan, and the ROI cycle is about 5 months.
Target market mandatory certification key standards special requirements
EU CE certification EN 12100 (risk assessment) requires labeling of migration limits for food contact materials (e.g. EU 10/2011)
US UL certification NSF/ANSI 8 (food equipment) requires FDA on-site audit
Southeast Asia SASO certification GSO 1016 (Mechanical Safety) requires an Arabic language operation manual
Conclusion: The Long Term Logic of Equipment Procurement
The essence of B-end equipment procurement is risk hedging. Suggest establishing a supplier evaluation model that quantifies ratings from four dimensions: qualification, technology, service, and cost. By introducing third-party testing, procurement risk can be reduced by 60%. Remember: Spending an extra 10% of your budget on equipment may help you save 100% of potential losses.
